![]() I must admit to being both slightly excited and apprehensive to add this watch to my collection. Lose the Sapphire at the back and spend the saving on luminescence in the dial. Probably my favourite piece at the moment and compares in quality to any watch I have under £1k. Why oh why did you guys not use luminescence on the white would have made a massive difference and added to the design aesthetic immeasurably.a real pity. My big bugbear here and the only thing I do not like and seems like a missed opportunity to me. ![]() It's not a very attractive movement and I think it cheapens the overall package. In fact I would save some money and have a solid back. Do not like the Lazer etching on the rotor. Now the cons.and these are very small, but no watch is perfect.ever. Very reliable and easy to service or repair if the need should ever occur. Very comfortable straight away and the quick release system is fantastic and a welcome relief from the normal mass produced brands that still don't include this. I cannot see a mention of whether the glass has any anti reflective coating, but it's very legible at any angle and in any light so I am thinking they must have at least 2 or 3 layers. Again, at this price point that may be unheard off. Really surprised that they managed to put both front and back sapphire glass in. Nothing too surprising here at this price though. Only downside to the cost cutting is the use of Lazer etching all over the back and the crown. Some signs of some cost-cutting in the matte finish of the case, but again at sub £1000 you may not find much better. Been collecting for 30 years and have and them all from Breguet and Patek, George Daniels, Grand Seiko all the way to small independent guys like yourselves.Ĭase is very well made. At this price point, you won't find a better watch. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |